* Using the Constitution to Save America #16 – National Liberty Alliance files at SUPREME COURT

Written By: admin - Feb• 26•23

 

 

The following “Peremptory Writ Mandamus” To the United States Supreme Court Concerning an Action at Law filed in the Northern District of New York Regarding High Treason with Military Enforcement is scheduled was reportedly filed the first week of February 2023.  Filing number or response is not yet known.

Friends at the National Liberty Alliance have proven immensely helpful and encouraging to Cedar Hills’ own former Councilman (1994 to 2000) “Barbie & Ken Cromar vs. Goliath lRS”.  NLA are true patriots doing their best to educate on how to use the Constitution to save the Constitution and SAVE AMERICA!

NLA has provide numerous document provided online and extensive research on the U.S. court system and its dishonor. They have reviewed drafts of our filings and offered suggestion.  They have provided volunteer “court watchers” listening on numerous court hearings.  Most importantly they have offered encouragement along with valuable education.

After YEARS of research, filings and organizing, this remarkable group has brought their work to a CLIMAX with the following filing to the SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES.   It’s what could be called a “magnum opus”, found here…

https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/mandamus-supreme-court

 

The 200+ page SCOTUS filing is actually made up of a cover presentation, followed by numerous sections.  We took the liberty to break down the PDF available at link above, down into 20 PDF documents below — which also serves as an INDEX — for you ease of understanding and sharing.  Incredibly educational.  Enjoy!:

 

00-prerogative_writ_mandamus_to_us_supreme_court

01-Writ- File On Demand – Cover Page – Table of Contnets

02-Memorandum of Law Concerning the Abrogation of the Law of the Land

03-Federal Rules of Civil Proceedures Merge Equity and Common Law

04-Memorandum of Law Concerning Law and Equity

05-Memorandum of Law Concerning Amendment XVII

06-Memorandum of Law Concering the Abrogation of the United States – An Act of High Treason

07-Memorandum of Law In Support of the Original Amendment XIII – Titles of Nobility

08-Memorandum of Law Concering Amendment XVI

09-Memorandum of Law Concerning the Rule of Common Law Courts

10-Memorandum of Law – Right of Free Access to Our Courts of Law

11-Memorandum of Law – Sheriff

12-Common Law Grand Jury Handbook

12-Memorandum of Law – Grand Jury Authority

13-Common Law Petit Jury Handbook

13-Memorandum of Law Petit Jury Authority

14-Memorandum of Law Concerning Jury Orientation

15-Memorandum of Law Concerning Engle v Vitale – 1963

16-Memorandum of Law – Non-Judicial Foreclosures

17-Memorandum of Law – Articel III Courts v Article I Courts

18-Memorandum on Habeas Corpus

19-Memorandum of Law Right to Practice Law

20-Memorandum of Law Family Court

 

(see the entire doc at:  https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/prerogative_writ_mandamus_to_us_supreme_court_0.pdf )

 

For example, “Barbie & Ken’s” efforts to follow the Brunson and NLA into the Supreme Court will focus on denial of HABEUS CORPUS – which is foundational Law that goes all the way back to the Magna Carta of 1215.  So, we’ve shared 17, 18 and 19 above that relate to our case we are drafting.  VERY helpful to have law cites already researched, ready and available.  GOOD STUFF!

 

 

The mission and purpose of National Liberty Alliance is to provide an on line National Venue where the People can organize, communicate, and learn the “science of government by consent”!

www.NationaLlibertyAlliance.org

As the swamp is drained and power removed from the deep-state a vacuum will occur and if We the People do not educate ourselves and fill these positions of power our servants will, and it will only be a matter of time before we find ourselves back under tyranny again. President Trump said; “In America, the people govern, the people rule, and the people are sovereign. I was elected not to take power, but to give power to the American people, where it belongs;” –

 

__________________________

 

CONCLUSION: 

In this series “Using the Constitution to Save America”, we have provided FOUR examples of how YOU and any of We the People can join the WINNING TEAM by getting involved at the Supreme Court;

– whether helping the BRUNSON case by signing and mailing your Affidavit to SCOTUS (see article #3),

– or by direct letter to SCOTUS with sample letter provided by The Community Support Foundation (see article #14),

– the Brunsons’ own electronic letter of support at cost of $2 at www.BrunsonBrothers.com ,

– and now here in this article #16 an example by the National Liberty Alliance (NLA) above.

No excuses. You can use the above examples as templates.  You can change them any way you want.  Your http://www.cedarhillscitizens.org/using-the-constitution-to-save-america-3-your-affidavit-can-support-brunsons-scotus-case/letter / filing / affidavit is YOURS and no one else’s.  Congrats!

YOU TOO can play a part in the Restoration of the Republic by doing your part to help SAVE the CONSTITUTION which is hanging by a thread!

Together, … we can do it!

 

 

 

_____________

 

* Using the Constitution to Save America! #3 – Your AFFIDAVIT can Support Brunsons’ SCOTUS case

 

 

* Using the Constitution to Save America #14 – Community Support Foundation’s SUPPORT of Brunson at SCOTUS

 

 

.

* Using the Constitution to Save America #15 – Armstrong Economics on Why SCOTUS is Refusing Brunson case

Written By: admin - Feb• 24•23

Friends of “Barbie & Ken v Goliath lRS” and the Brunson Brothers SCOTUS case are regularly sharing their own discoveries regard Law & Constitution and strategies for VICTORY for ALL of We the People.

The following story comments specially on the Brunson Brothers’ and provides remarkable insights we think are worth of your intelligent consideration.

 

 

Supreme Court Refused to Hear Brunson Case As Expected

COMMENT: Marty, you understand markets and the legal system. You were right again. The Supreme Court rejected the Brunson case.

KQ

REPLY: As I wrote before, this was an interesting argument, but it will be even more

“earth-shattering if the Supreme Court actually takes the case and rules on the validity of taking an oath of office.”

How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic if you refuse to even investigate the claim?

US Supreme Court

 

Rule of Law (Constitution) vs. Rule of Man (tyranny)*

Here is the real monumental problem. Does the Supreme Court act constitutionally or has it denied citizens the right to be heard as declared by the Constitution itself? This is why they fight to stack the Supreme Court because the law is just not the law. The real issue is the Judiciary Act of 1925 and the court itself.

I specialized, not just in history, but also in the rise and fall of nations. Historically, a collapse in the rule of law is a key element in the fall of nations. I studied law intensely and some lawyers will often call me on constitutional questions. Why? When you go to law school, you spend very little time on the Constitution. The bulk of law concerns statutory law which is everything written and passed by Congress from civil rights to Obamacare. Very few cases end up challenging the constitutionality of a statute. Instead, they merely challenge the unconstitutional acts of government agents such as police and politicians.

The Supreme Court held that the Constitution is negative, meaning it is a restraint upon government, in Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980). That means citizens cannot demand that government create any social program for there is no such Marxist component to the Constitution that people assume exists. There is no government obligation to pay for an abortion or a heart transplant.

I am going to make a statement here I have made to Constitutional lawyers that make their eyes pop out. The Supreme Court has no Constitutional right or permission to exercise “discretion” to hear a case. They must hear every case presented to them for that is dictated by the Constitution and cannot be circumvented by a statute written by Congress or by its own rule-making practice. No statute or rule can negate the constitution as defined by the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Paragraph 2).

The Supreme Court receives approximately 7,000-8,000 petitions for a writ of certiorari each term (year). The court grants and hears oral arguments in about 80 cases per year in a country of over 300 million. That is outrageous and this practice denies the people the constitutional guarantee of a tripartite government (3 branches) with each branch acting as a check and balance against the others. Let’s review what the structure of government crafted by the Founding Fathers created.

 

Marbury v Madison is Powerful – but NOT taught in Law School anymore *

Marshall John Chief Justice - 1

Chief Justice Marshall was held in the landmark case Marbury v Madison, 5 US 137 (1 Cranch) (1803) in which he declared the role of the Judiciary branch. “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” When the nation began, the Supreme Court justices rode on “circuits.” Each justice heard cases in their assigned circuits around the country for there were no circuit courts with federal judges. Article III, Section I, of the Constitution expressly states:

“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” 

The Constitution guaranteed the Supreme Court. It gave the option to Congress to create inferior federal courts around the country, but this was by no means mandatory. The implications of this are quite profound for it means that Congress can close all the federal inferior district and appellate courts, but it cannot close the Supreme Court. The tripartite structure of government requires the Supreme Court – not inferior courts. Justice Reynolds explained this succinctly:

“The accepted doctrine is that the lower federal courts were created by the acts of Congress and their powers and duties depend upon the acts which called them into existence, or subsequent ones which extend or limit.”

Gillis v California, 293 US 52, 66 (1934)

 

“Process” is denying YOUR right to be Heard by SCOTUS *

Your constitutional right to be heard is being DENIED. That right is being circumvented by demanding you go to a district court judge, then appeal to that circuit court, and then apply to be heard as one of the 7,000+ petitions when they only accept 80. What if a child could not speak to his or her father and would only communicate with them through some nanny? Is there a relationship bond between the father and the child? Of course not.

Inferior courts are under no obligation to apply even a uniform legal code. Each has its own rules and precedents that are unique to each circuit. The law as practiced in New York is different than as practiced in California, Texas, or Florida. It is not all the same! There is no guarantee of EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW when these circuit courts are free to do as they like. The media never writes about this and does not find it strange that we have no unified rule of law in the United States. You have to get to the Supreme Court and they are supposed to take such cases to establish the law nationally when it differs among the circuits.

Chief Justice Marshall also held in 1821 a very important decision holding:

“If the constitution does not confer on the court, or on the federal judiciary, the power sought to be exercised, it is in vain that the act of Congress purports to confer it…” 

Cohen v Virginia, 19 US 264 (6 Wheat) (1821) id/324

 

Congress cannot circumvent the Constitution – PERIOD! *

Congress reduced the power of the Supreme Court by eliminating the constitutional status of the court by enabling them to decide to hear cases at their “discretion,” but that is totally unconstitutional for no statute can amend the Constitution. Any statute or rule created by Congress cannot circumvent the Constitution – PERIOD!

 

The Judiciary Act of 1925 UNCONSTITUTIONALLY

reduced SCOTUS to a Court of discretion *

The Constitution ONLY created the Supreme Court. Congress created the statutory inferior court which can be closed at any time because they were NOT created by the Constitution. Therefore, it is blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL for the Judiciary Act of 1925 to reduce the Supreme Court to one of discretion. That is a constructive amendment to the constitution which in itself is an act of outright rebellion.

 

[NOTE:  ALL memes, pics and  ” * ” items are CHCRG editor additions to the post.  For original posting and support for

Armstrong Economist

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/supreme-court-refused-to-hear-the-brunson-case-as-expected/  ]

 

 

.

* Using the Constitution to Save America #14 – Community Support Foundation’s SUPPORT of Brunson at SCOTUS

Written By: admin - Feb• 23•23

 

Friends,

On Wednesday February 22, 2023, three letter/affidavits were sent to SCOTUS on behalf of the Brunson Brothers. The affidavits were over-nighted via USPS giving notice to SCOTUs that their decision caused them to commit misprision.

Below is a sample of the letter/affidavit you can use to send your own letter/affidavit to SCOTUS as one of We the People (Community Support Foundation) – When you sign the letter in front of a notary this becomes an affidavit. Sending this to SCOTUS, you effectively join with the Brunson Brothers as a Co-Petitioner to have SCOTUS hear and rule on the case, Brunson v Adams st al. that is still currently before SCOTUS.

Tom Fairbanks
Community Health Advocate
Community Support Foundation
communitysupportfoundation@protonmail.com

 

_________________________

 

 

 

 

Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

 

Attn:  Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence Thomas,
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.,
Associate Justice Elena Kagan., Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett,
Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh,
Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

 

RE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al – Case No.: 22-380    (Certified Mailing # Inserted Here – Optional)

 

Dear Justices:

This letter/affidavit is to express my support of the above referenced case, in reference to your recent decision to deny hearing the case, because I am concerned the United States has experienced a national security breach.

Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary – accepted by four Acts of Congress – serving as commentary on Constitutional law, under the definition of “misprision” states a purpose of this Affidavit: “4. It is the duty of every good citizen, knowing of a treason or felony having been committed; to inform a magistrate. Silently to observe the commission of a felony, without using any endeavors to apprehend the offender, is a misprision.”  1 Russ.on Cr. 43; Hawk. P. C. c. 59, s. 6; Id. Book 1, c. s. 1; 4 Bl. Com. 119.

 

There is ample evidence presented to SCOTUS to show that Brunson’s claims have plausible merit. 388 elected officials collectively conspired to violate their oaths of office and you are hereby notified of this potential felony and treason by this undersigned “good citizen.”

 

The Department of Homeland Security has a national campaign to raise public awareness of the signs of terrorism and terrorism-related crimes called, “If you see something, say something.”  This current case before SCOTUS leaves a most important question before the court, “What good does it do, if no one responds?”

 

I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

 

I ask that you stand against the invasion and influence of foreign and domestic enemies, and uphold the Supreme Law of the Land by granting the petition. You truly are in a position that the world has ever seen before and I pray for you and your just ruling upholding the Constitution of the United States.

Sincerely,

Name:

Date:
Community Support Foundation

 

_________________________

 

See the 3 actual AFFIDAVITs sent to via overnight Express Mail which was received today February 23, 2023…

US Express Mail – EI 499 552 060 US

“Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Postal Facility:

WASHINGTON, DC 20543

February 23, 2023, 11:24 am”

 

Read it here…

Signed Misprision Affidavits in Support of Brunson

 

 

 

.

* Using the Constitution to Save America #13 – BIDEN’s “Legally Binding” Transfer of Sovereignty to W.H.O. is TREASON

Written By: admin - Feb• 23•23

END OF AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY thanks to Team Biden?

STOP the Biden attempt to Steal our Freedom

Any member of Congress who does not move to impeach Biden over this is abrogating their constitutional duty in what is called MISPRISION OF TREASON — and should resign or be removed from office. 

The following story highlights why the Brunson case at SCOTUS is so important.  The Brunson case if HEARD by the Supreme Court could remove 388 Congressmen — including Biden, Kamala, Pence and Pelosi — BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM OFFICE — as Congress failed to investigate the election before “certifying” an election that installed what may be an agent TRAITOR acting in the interest of a foreign nation.  Evidence points to National Security breech and involvement by China and possibly others.

This means that IF Congress and the courts — especially the Supreme Court — does not address a notice of TREASON, it becomes a “misprision of treason” where those notified if they do not act to address the Treason are considered fully connected and guilty of the Treason.

Check out the Gateway Pundit report below and SEND it to your Congressman.  Ask your Congressman  what he or she is doing about this UN-Constitutional OATH-breaking act by Biden.  Calling for his ARREST?  IMPEACHMENT?  PROSECUTION FOR TREASON?

If Congressman is not part of addressing and solving the treason out of the White House, then THEY TOO ARE GUILTY OF TREASON!

 

 

 

END OF AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY: Biden Regime Negotiates “Legally Binding” Deal To Give Chinese-Backed World Health Organization Full Authority Over US Pandemic Policies – No Senate Approval Needed

 

The Biden Regime never fails to orchestrate an avenue to circumvent the U.S. Constitution and betray the American people. A bombshell report from the Epoch Times Saturday reveals the Regime is about to surrender America’s sovereignty to the World Health Organization (WHO) and give them full control over future pandemic policy.

The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on these negotiations between the Regime and the WHO over the past year.

TGP’s Alicia Powe, for example, exclusively revealed that Biden’s Health and Human Service Department secretly submitted proposed amendments, “Strengthen WHO preparedness for and response to health emergencies,” to the WHO to reform International Health Regulations of 2005, an existing health treaty.

The amendments delegate the international body of unelected bureaucrats more authority to define what constitutes a pandemic, when a pandemic is in progress, how long a pandemic lasts and how “to prevent, detect and respond to future public health emergencies of international concern,” ultimately delegating the WHO total authority over emergency operations in the U.S. during a “public health emergency.”

TGP’s Julian Conradson also reported there is a plan for a mandatory, universal digital passport and ID system.

The WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) has scheduled a meeting for Feb. 27 so members can work out the final terms and sign.

Once America officially signs on to this agreement, we will be completely at the mercy of the globalist organization which helped the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) cover up the original COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan.

Negotiations between Biden Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and WHO head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spawned what is called a “zero draft” of a pandemic treaty. The draft was published on Feb. 1 and now needs ratification from all 194 WHO member states.

The zero draft gives the WHO the power to declare and manage a global pandemic emergency. Once a health emergency is declared every signatory, including the United States, must submit to the authority of the WHO. This includes caving to them on treatments, lockdowns and vaccine mandates along with government surveillance.

Link to draft:

WHO Zero Draft

Thanks to the CCP and the WHO, the virus went on spread across the world and kill millions of innocent people. Over one million Americans alone have died from COVID.

Even more chillingly, the Biden regime does not feel they need to submit this agreement for Senate approval because they are not calling it an official treaty despite it having the full force of one. Common sense tells us this is an unconstitutional maneuver but the Obama regime skated by on the original Iran Deal using similar legal reasoning.

Counting on the federal courts to save us may prove foolhardy as well, despite them being somewhat right-leaning. The Epoch Times reminds us there are Supreme Court cases where previous administrations have prevailed in similar circumstances.

The first is the State of Missouri v. Holland, where the Supreme Court ruled that treaties supersede state laws. The second decision, United States v. Belmont, ruled that executive agreements without Senate consent can be legally binding, with the force of treaties.

We also have Supreme Court Justices nominated by Republicans who are not reliably conservative. We cannot count their willingness to break precedent and uphold the Constitution.

The Epoch Times reported:

The Biden administration is preparing to sign up the United States to a “legally binding” accord with the World Health Organization (WHO) that would give this Geneva-based UN subsidiary the authority to dictate America’s policies during a pandemic.

Despite widespread criticism of the WHO’s response to the COVID pandemic, U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra joined with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in September 2022 to announce “the U.S.-WHO Strategic Dialogue.” Together, they developed a “platform to maximize the longstanding U.S. government-WHO partnership, and to protect and promote the health of all people around the globe, including the American people.”

These discussions and others spawned the “zero draft” of a pandemic treaty, published on Feb. 1, which now seeks ratification by all 194 WHO member states. A meeting of the WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) is scheduled for Feb. 27 to work out the final terms, which all members will then sign.

Written under the banner of “the world together equitably,” the zero draft grants the WHO the power to declare and manage a global pandemic emergency. Once a health emergency is declared, all signatories, including the United States, would submit to the authority of the WHO regarding treatments, government regulations such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates, global supply chains, and monitoring and surveillance of populations.

The WHO pandemic treaty is part of a two-track effort, coinciding with an initiative by the World Health Assembly (WHA) to create new global pandemic regulations that would also supersede the laws of member states. The WHA is the rule-making body of the WHO, comprised of representatives from the member states.

“Both [initiatives] are fatally dangerous,” Francis Boyle, professor of international law at Illinois University, told The Epoch Times. “Either one or both would set up a worldwide medical police state under the control of the WHO, and in particular WHO Director-General Tedros. If either one or both of these go through, Tedros or his successor will be able to issue orders that will go all the way down the pipe to your primary care physicians.”

A key question surrounding the accord is whether the Biden administration can bind America to treaties and agreements without the consent of the U.S. Senate, which is required under the Constitution. The zero draft concedes that, per international law, treaties between countries must be ratified by national legislatures, thus respecting the right of their citizens to consent. However, the draft also includes a clause that the accord will go into effect on a “provisional” basis, as soon as it is signed by delegates to the WHO, and therefore it will be legally binding on members without being ratified by legislatures.

There are several U.S. Supreme Court decisions that may support the Biden administration in this. They include State of Missouri v. Holland, in which the Supreme Court ruled that treaties supersede state laws. Other decisions, such as United States v. Belmont, ruled that executive agreements without Senate consent can be legally binding, with the force of treaties.

The WHO, the U.S. Health and Human Services Department, and the World Bank were contacted regarding this article but did not provide a response.

Assuming the Regime finalizes this agreement, our liberties will completely evaporate when the next pandemic happens and countless Americans will perish in the process. Any member of Congress who does not move to impeach Biden over this is abrogating their constitutional duty.

 

_______________________

 

 

 

* Using the Constitution to Save America #12 – SCOTUS Brunson Brothers / “Barbie & Ken” SPECIAL OFFER

Written By: admin - Feb• 20•23

LIMITED QUANTITY “Patriot Package”….

In support of the BRUNSON v. ADAMS, et al (388 Congressmen including Biden / Kamala / Pence / Pelosi) currently at the Supreme Court – case #22-380.  And in support of “Barbie & Ken Cromar vs Goliath lRS” also going to SCOTUS, we proudly announce the “Patriot Package” that give YOU an opportunity to help us stay alive as we work through this complex law process.

 

“Denied” but NOT Discouraged

.

February 21, 2023 the Supreme Court “Conference” results from the 17th as “DENIED”.

– It’s true that had the Brunson case been selected by SCOTUS for Hearing that would have been a BIG WIN.

– However, the Brunson case is “denied” by SCOTUS is only a small loss as case #22-380 still has four more opportunities to “Petition for Re-Hearing”.  The case is still ALIVE!

All of this legal process continues to buy more time to alert and educate the nation about this landmark case that still could REMOVE a sitting President, VP and 384 Congressmen and block them from ever serving in any government job and any level — even as a dog catcher.  It’s never happened during our 235+ year history of the Constitution.

It would take a MIRACLE. But ours is a God of “just in time” miracles.  You can play a part in helping to make MIRACLES happen…

 

We need a little bit of help from our friends please?

The Brunson Brothers need on-going support with Americans contacting the Supreme Court in behalf of their case.  (see BrunsonBrothers.com)  So does “Barbie & Ken” Cromar (Loy’s Cedar Hills, Utah old neighbor) as they work their way towards the Supreme Court too – after 5+ years and 18 cases of corrupt court process fighting to get their home, lives, liberty and honor back.

________________________

 

 SPECIAL Limited Quantity “Patriot Package” OFFER

$150 suggested Donation

only 40 Patriot Packages available while supply lasts

Donating is easy.  Three simple steps:

 

.
.



.
[Note:  Please ignore all other offers & prices as they are unavailable until we can fabricate new DVDs & Blu-rays with the help of YOUR kind donation.  Simply type in $150 in the amount prompt.]
See details also at:   www.MIRACLESinGodWeTrust.com
.
______________________________________________________
.
..

HERE’s what we’ll send you for your kind donation above …

 

This Patriot Package includes the following:

Receive two sets of “A More Perfect Union” and “MIRACLES: In God We Trust” in both DVD and Blu-ray of each.  One set to keep for your family, and the other to give away or donate to public libraries, home-schoolers, churches and schools.  (four discs total)

.

Receive a copy of the HISTORIC Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States in “Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S. Adams, et al” – exactly as required by the court 6″ x 9 1/4″ – A Collector’s Item!

 

Receive a copy of Loy Brunson’s unique and inspiring CONSTITUTION – that includes important analysis of power of the Constitution to protect America and We the People.  Includes “How & Why Promoting Socialism is a Felony”…

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receive two (2) copies of “The Sheriff’s Handbook”;

one for you, and one to take to offer as a gift to your County Sheriff with permission in advance to make copies for every one of his Deputies — to help inspire them to know how to uphold their Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution from “enemies foreign and DOMESTIC” and how to protect YOUR county from over-reaching federal agencies — because after all, the Sheriff is the highest law enforcement authority in the County even above lRS, EPA, FBI, and other three-letter alphabet agencies.  (80 pages – published by The National Liberty Alliance)

 

 

.
FOUR copies total of the standard Pocket Constitution – one with each of the four videos. 

 

________________________

 

Also Receive…

FOUR (4) pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes with four (4) AFFIDAVITS in support of Brunson v. Adams et al, ready to fill in the blanks, and sign before a Notary, before dropping the letter in the mailbox.  One for you, and three others you think love America too.  EASY!

Now you too can officially add your name in support of this landmark case — on the record — and be a part of HISTORY!

.

 

_____________________

 

NOTICE INVOICE for TRESPASS for $11.18M to Utah County Sheriff Mike Smith – with numerous full- COLOR  images!

.
Receive a copy of how “Barbie & Ken” held an Constitutionally-incompetent Sheriff financially accountable to the itemized $11,180,000.00 INVOICE for him and his 44 Deputies of the trespass and kidnapping via an unprecedented, Warrant-less 75-man SWAT, and the “Intent to Collect” from whatever source – likely & eventually to be paid thru their state-required individual Bonds.  Note:  This is how we can restore the Constitution, by hitting their wallet when they act outside of lawful authority, right?!

 

_____________________

.

 

Receive ONE copy of what’s also called THE GRAND JURY Handbook:

Which provides instructions on how to bring Constitutional Law and Order back to your county and state through the use of Grand Juries.  Great detail and instructions on how to succeed in restoring genuine power to We the People when lawfully and intelligently organized.  (40 pages)

 

________________________

 

This LIMITED QUANTITY Special $150 Offer is designed to help Brunsons/Cromars raise seed money to hire Raland Brunson to mass produce the DVDs and Blu-rays as this is what he does for a living.  As well as bring awareness to good Patriots, expanding their education and understanding as we team up and battle side by side to Restore the Republic under our glorious Constitution.

Launching this Special Offer on President’s Day seemed appropriate — as we NEED a real President back in the White House, right?   With your kind support with this $150 donation together we may very well soon restore the LEGITIMATE President back to the White House – hopefully before the current one destroys the country and leads us into a nuclear world war.

So, this donation is a GOOD investment.  These won’t last long.  Make sure you’re a part of history….

To get your Patriot Package, please order now at:

www.MIRACLESinGodWeTrust.com/contact/ 

 

 

 

Good!  Now let’s work together to help to make them happen!

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

* Using the Constitution to Save America #11 – The SCOTUS Nuclear Bomb – URGENT Message

Written By: admin - Feb• 19•23

Loy has a very urgent message for all Americans particularly MAGA.

We have discovered a nuclear weapon that could be used by the conservatives or radical left.

 

Time is of the essence! The actual power the SCOTUS has in this case is unprecedented and could be either used for or against them.

The decision of removing a sitting President, Vice President and Congress is in their hands by WE THE PEOPLE. The clock is ticking.

Who will move first?  Tick-tick-tick.

Pray for America.

 

 

 

Please visit me on Youtube @Ninoscorner

David Nino Rodriguez and Ninoscorner.tv where I upload deep state real news daily.

Twitter- NinoBoxer
Telegram- Ninoscorner

 

 

.

* Using the Constitution to Save America #10 – GOOD NEWS: If Newsweek reports on Brunson – SCOTUS case Scares Them!

Written By: admin - Feb• 19•23

Brunson case #22-380 at Supreme Court called Brunson v Adams et al (388 Congressmen) which was denied in Jan 6, 2023 at behind closed doors in SCOTUS “Conference” with the “DENIED” announced Monday at 9:oo am January 9, 2023.

However, the Brunson were NOT discouraged, and Raland filed his “Petition for Re-Hearing” — the first of five opportunities — which occurred behind closed doors “Conference” on Friday February 17, 2023.

As of this writing, Sunday February 19th,  SCOTUS has already made it’s decision, which will be publicly announced probably Tuesday the 21st, because tomorrow is President’s Day – a holiday.

 

M.S.M.’s IGNORING the Story Didn’t worked

— Now, It’s “Report and Destroy” to Sour the Public

The Main Stream Media (MSM propagandists) can no longer ignore the People or the possibility of SCOTUS’s actual power to remove from office of 388 Congressmen including Biden, Kamala, Pence and Pelosio, for those who broke their Oath of Office immediately – at any moment – whether they choose to take it to Hearings or not.  In fact reading the NEWSWEEK story below, though not specifically stated, essentially acknowledges the POWER of the Supreme Court to adjudicate a case in the interest of National Security – that could remove from office those who clearly violate their Oath of Office — as in the “certification” (declare to be as true, honest and accurate) of an un-certifiable 2020 election without addressing over 100 members of Congress lawful demand for 10-day investigation of mountains of affidavits and evidence of the overnight FLIP of the votes from Trump to Biden.

So worry that taking the Brunson case to the Hearing process is dangerous to the Supreme Court Justices as Congress or others could try to wield the Constitution as a sword against conservatives.  (Notice that the term “Republican” was not used – as many are R.I.N.O.’s – Republican In Name Only.)  Some are afraid that SCOTUS could to claim conservatives should be removed from office because of their breaking their Oath of Office to “protect and defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and DOMESTIC”, with childlike sandbox bully tactics of, “if you do it to us, we’ll do it to you” temper tantrums.

 

Don’t fall for the Temper Tantrum  —  We’re WINNING!

“Bring it on!”  Fighting about the Constitution is the right kind of fight to have, isn’t it?  Actually this fight is decades and decades over due.  Wouldn’t a debate suddenly put the spotlight on the Constitution and it’s provisions?  Hallelujah!   The Deep State players will lose that fight every time, as people are waking up to just what a FAIL the socialist / communist “strategies” are, based on the “fruit” of their actions.

For example:  Biden’s Open Border policy has intentionally created a flood of ILLEGALs crossing our borders, and then these foreigners of unknown origin or intent into the country (millions of potential “Trojan Horse” enemies in the gate) have been scattered and systematically disseminated via plane, bus and rail throughout the nation in direct violation of the Oath of Office:

Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

If we cannot control our borders we cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it’s that simple. Clearly, the enemies of our nation do not want this nation to survive.  Sadly, many of our nation’s traitors are home born, and now in positions of authority throughout government.  And clearly, in countless ways, the US Inc government including White House, FBI, CIA, lRS, EPA and many others, have declared WAR on the American people.

Who do you know that really believes that our US governments are really looking out for and protecting We the People?  With government working and warring so hard against the People, could be argued that could do better with virtually no government at all?

With that perspective, now read the Newsweek article to see how the Deep State domestic enemies support, spin and try to protect their Deep State power and control over the people — including pushing us to international government that kicks the Constitution to the curbside — if they can….

 

 

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider whether or not to hear a lawsuit that seeks to remove President Joe Biden from the White House and reinstate former President Donald Trump to office.

The Brunson v. Adams lawsuit claims that lawmakers violated their oaths of office by allegedly failing to investigate a foreign intervention in the 2020 presidential race which allegedly rigged the election against Trump.

The case is based on the claim that the defendants—who include Congress members, Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and former Vice President Mike Pencevoted to certify the 2020 presidential election after receiving a valid request from 154 members of Congress to investigate unfounded claims of electoral fraud in six states.

 

The Supreme Court declined to consider the lawsuit on January 9, but the plaintiff, Raland Brunson, filed an appeal on January 23. Now, the court has to reconsider whether or not to hear the case, according to an update on the SCOTUS’ website that read that the lawsuit was “distributed for conference” on Friday.

Supreme Court Reconsiders Case to Reinstate Trump

Above, former U.S. President Donald Trump waves after speaking during an event at his Mar-a-Lago home on November 15, 2022, in Palm Beach, Florida. The U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider whether or not to hear a lawsuit that seeks to remove President Joe Biden from the White House and reinstate Trump to office. Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

 

 

“The petition was denied. We will now make our next move,” Brunson wrote on Facebook after the court declined the case on January 9, Zach Schonfeld of The Hill reported last month. “A petition for reconsideration. Hang in their everyone,” Brunson wrote on Facebook following the decision.”

Brunson’s lawsuit claims that election fraud made his vote for Trump in 2020 invalid when he cast his ballot in Utah. He raised the case in lower courts which dismissed it for the lack of jurisdiction.

The suit named all 387 members of Congress who voted to certify Biden’s electoral votes and called for them all to be removed from their roles—along with Biden and Harris—and be prohibited from ever running for office again. Brunson also asked for over $2 billion tax-free in damages, according to The Hill.

In the appeal filed on January 23, Brunson argued that the court should grant a rehearing because the case “represents a very powerful domestic covert operation that is so benign that it cannot been seen on how it has breached our national security, and how it is affecting the national security of both Canada and Mexico, and how it has circulated fears that we might soon see the destruction of property along with a large volume of bloodshed in our own streets.”

 

__________________________

 

Comment:  See how that works?  Now that the propagandist MSM can no longer hide the story about the power of SCOTUS to help save our country, they have to “color” it with their FEAR-spin.

There ain’t nothing to fear about an honest discussion about the Constitution.  The longer and LOUDER the discussion about the Constitution — and all who are breaking their Oath — the better.

Using the Constitution is how we Save America.  Let the debate begin.  Bring it on!!

 

 

.

* Using the Constitution to Save America #9 – Send YOUR Declaration of Charges to SCOTUS Electronically – EASY!

Written By: admin - Feb• 15•23

YOU can help encourage the Supreme Court Justices to HEAR the Brunson Brothers’ case #22-380 with your name and signature.  Easy!

On Friday February 17, 2023, the nine Justices will vote behind closed doors in “Conference” which cases the Court will Hear arguments on.

Remember, February 17th Conference is only the first of five opportunities the Brunsons have to Petition for Re-Hearing of the case.  They may quickly agree.  Or, they may wait to a fifth and final appeal.

Therefore, whether the Justices decide to hear the Brunson case or not — the following “DECLARATION OF CHARGES” can be sent into the court electronically and help to encourage to Court to SUPPORT the case to have it heard, and then to vote to support it.

The following Word doc template is not the only way to do this.  You can adjust it to your liking ,remembering that it is YOUR testimony of the truth to which you are signing your name.  Make it yours!  Click here for the template….

Brunson Affidavit RED – KC

 

NOTE: Replace all RED text with your correct info.  Then make the Final doc be ALL BLACK text.

Then, as Deron’s instructions read:

 

SUPREME COURT ACCESS…. at  www.SCOTUS.gov

Type in Supreme Court contact.

Click on Public Information Office.

That will take you to the; Contact Us- Public Information Office, page.

Fill out form info and cut and paste your affidavit into the box provided. 

You will get immediate online proof of receipt and later email verifying receipt.”

NOTE:  These instructions may be improved as new info becomes available.

 

 

Thanks for doing your part to use the Constitution to save the Constitution and America’s liberty it protects.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

* Using the Constitution to Save America #8 – TRUMP Alerts America of BRUNSON / SCOTUS case!

Written By: admin - Feb• 15•23

Donald J. Trump – the 45th President of the United States has alerted his “small following” of “only 18 million followers” about the Brunson Brothers case going to CONFERENCE on Frieday February 17th.

I, Ken Cromar, was on the phone with Deron Brunson at the time he just learned of TRUMP’s news blast. ” WOW!,” was pretty much all that was able to be said.

Here’s Trump’s ALERT…!

 

 

Here’s the LINK to the Just the News story Trump referenced…

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/scotus-reconsider-hearing-2020-election-case-against-biden-harris-pence

 

____________________________

 

 

W O W !  and Thanks Mr. President

There’s really not much more to be said when Pres. Trump joins in the discussion.  He’s got a HUGE “microphone” right?

Later in the afternoon, Loy Brunson texted me the following BRUNSON BROTHERS SCOTUS Telegram posting version of the above….

 

 

Here’s the exact link to Brunsons’ posting at their Telegram account…

https://t.me/BrunsonBrothersSCOTUS/343

 

____________________________________

 

 

VICTORY is Coming!  Will you Be There?

Do you want to play a part in the coming VICTORY and the Restoration of the Republic?   Please consider printing out an AFFIDAVIT that you can fill out and sign in front of a Notary and mail to the Supreme Court to be filed WITH and ON the Raland Brunson vs Alma S. Adams, et al. case #22-380 against 388 Oath-breaking Congressmen, including Biden, Kamala, Pence and Pelosi.  Click the following link…

 

* Using the Constitution to Save America! #3 – Your AFFIDAVIT can Support Brunsons’ SCOTUS case

 

____________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, please PRAY for the Brunson Brothers and the Supreme Court Justices.

But don’t just pray, take your pen and sign YOUR name in support of the Constitution — essentially putting your name right beside George Washington and the 38 other signers of the Constitution on September 17, 1787 at Independence Hall in Philadelphia.

Do you love your country?  Do you respect the sacrifice of blood by so many veterans who gave their all?  Do you care about your children and grandchildrens’ future in freedom?

Then PULL OUT YOUR PEN and SIGN!

God Blees you and God Bless America!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

.

* Using the Constitution to Save America #7 – WND – Inaugurated ‘fraudulently’: Supremes to look again at 2020 election claims

Written By: admin - Feb• 15•23

HUGE:

Now the story about Brunson Brothers SCOTUS case before the Supremes’ CONFERENCE is set for Friday February 17th — is rolling out across the nation.  Here’s just one example from a trusted news source…

_______________________________

 

 

 

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to take another look at 2020 election-fraud claims, and it will only take four votes for the case to come under a full briefing and arguments schedule.

A report from Just the News reveals the justices are to review a lawsuit charging that Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others, including 291 members of the House and 94 senators “violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election before certifying Biden as the winner.”

That meant, the case charges, that Biden and Harris were inaugurated “fraudulently.”

The plaintiff in the case is Raland J. Brunson, and he’s seeking the removal from office of those who committed that offense.

The court last month declined to hear the case, but he filed a petition for reconsideration and now the court has scheduled a private conference for that review.

Four of the nine justices must vote to review for a hearing to be scheduled.

Critics of President Trump’s claims about election fraud say his arguments repeatedly have lost in courts – often to decisions by Democrat-appointed judges.

But what is known about the 2020 election is that Mark Zuckerberg handed out, through foundations, hundreds of millions of dollars that local election officials often used to influence the result by recruiting voters from Democrat precincts.

Even worse, social and legacy media worked together to suppress accurate reporting about the scandalous overseas business deals that were benefiting the Biden family. Dozens of intelligence experts falsely labeled the reporting, about details contained in a laptop computer abandoned by Hunter Biden, as Russian “disinformation” when it actually was the truth.

 

WND is now on Trump’s Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews

 

The Media Research Center later found out, through a poll, that 36% of self-described Biden voters said they were not aware of evidence linking Joe Biden personally to those deals.

Thirteen percent of those voters, 4.6% of all Biden voters, said had they known the facts, they would not have voted for Biden.

That change undoubtedly would have cost Biden victories in multiple swing states, and would have installed President Trump in his second term.

Brunson is representing himself in the case and filed the case in 2021 in Utah. He appealed to the Supreme Court after lower courts disagreed with him.

He eventually went directly to the Supreme Court by invoking the high court’s Rule 11, Just the News reported, which allows a case to bypass a lower appeals decision if it “is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this court.”

 

He argues, simply, that if there is no penalty for election officials who violate their oaths of office, the oaths essentially are worthless, or “not binding.”

Just the News explained, “a ‘rigged election’ is equivalent to war since both ‘put into power’ a ‘victor,’ he argues, and therefore allegations of ‘a rigged election’ must be investigated.”

He said, “The Oath of Office requires that aid and comfort cannot be given to those levying war through a rigged election.”

Further, he said a rigged presidential result is a “threat to the Constitution.”

Members of the GOP in Congress had requested an “emergency audit” of the election in disputed states, and a total of 147 Republican lawmakers objected to the certification of Biden’s election results.

 

Link to the above story …

Inaugurated ‘fraudulently’: Supremes to look again at 2020 election claims

 

 

 

_______________________________

 

 

NOTE:   The following is a WND supporting ad which should help give you an idea of WND and how you might support their good work…

 

WND EDITOR’S NOTE: Long the world’s most Christian nation, America today is being taken over by a new “official” national religion, one being imposed on the entire populace by every major societal institution, from government, media and big tech, to academia, entertainment and business.

This new state religion is Wokeism. “Going woke” conjures up visions of someone claiming to be acutely sensitive (“awake”) to “systemic social and political injustice.” And not just alleged bigotry against blacks, but toward every other “minority” as well, from LGBT folk – especially everything transgender and “nonbinary” – to “undocumented immigrants.” All of them, being VICTIMS, intrinsically more virtuous than the shameful oppressor class: primarily heterosexual white males.

This new “woke” consciousness has turned America upside-down – from the nationwide Antifa and Black Lives Matter riots in 2020, to tearing down of historic monuments, to demanding multi-million-dollar reparation payments for blacks, to appointing transgenders as top government officials, to rampant reverse discrimination in every area of life, to the U.S. military imposing mandatory “diversity training” and transgender pronoun use on all personnel, causing recruitment to disastrously plummet.

Yet there is hope. Being “saved” – which in Wokeism is called being “woke” – is largely a matter of worshipping victimhood by becoming an “ally” and “defender” of all the many victim classes, and a determined enemy of the straight white male oppressor class. Thus, “joining the righteous” as an ally – even if one is cursed to be a straight white male – opens the door mercifully for salvation, even to the most wretched.

That is the power of the religion of Wokeism. And it’s explored as never before in the February 2023 issue of WND’s critically acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine. If you’ve ever wondered, for example, exactly how the most radical elements in American society are successfully pressuring the biggest corporations into adopting the most outrageous and immoral policies imaginable, even when doing so permanently damages and devalues the company, the stunning answers are in this issue of Whistleblower, titled “WOKEISM: AMERICA’S OFFICIAL STATE RELIGION.”

For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!

 

 

______________________________

 

 

 

.