UPDATE: APRIL 14, 2023
.
Yesterday, this Editor, Ken Cromar (former Cedar Hills Councilman 1994 to 2000) Raland Brunson declared that I was the first to whom he divulged that his stealth court case filed against THREE Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Katenji Brown Jackson.
.
See side bar at right to read yesterday’s story and to review Raland’s March 17, 2023 (St. Patrick’s Day) secret stealth filing against the three Justices in the SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH – case #23091367. Raland didn’t even tell his brothers what he was doing. Everyone is SURPRISED!!
.
In talking at length in follow-up today with Raland a number of points about his unique case were discussed. His law strategy seems quite well thought out, reasonable, rational, and by this Editor’s estimation — brilliant! Raland has authorized me to share with you our CHCRG readers only the following key points:
.
.
Point #1: Sometimes it’s not what is said, but rather what is not said that is most important. Therefore, what the THREE JUSTICE DEFENDANTS did not say or do was: they did NOT Stay or cause the case to be vacated (or “deleted”). The JUSTICES could’ve exercised a prerogative outside of their own rules which requires a Decision on a case before ruling – and could’ve simply “nuked it”. They did not.
.
.
Point #2: Any Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States has the authority to ORDER a STAY without any other justice getting involved.
.
Raland provide me a beautiful example of where on Oct. 31, 2022, Donald J. Trump’s team of attorneys filed an “APPLICATION” to the Supreme Court in case No. 22A362 in:
.
Donald J. Trump, et al., Applicants
v.
Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives, et al.
.
SEE the case DOCKET here with active links to the actual court filings, etc.: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22a362.html
.
SCOTUSblog.com explained the ISSUE this way:
.
“Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that held that the House Ways and Means Committee may obtain former President Donald Trump’s tax returns.” ( https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/trump-v-committee-on-ways-and-means/ )
.
Under the SCOTUS Proceedings and Orders section please note that THE VERY NEXT DAY on November 1, 2022, that Justice Clarence Thomas entered an ORDER to STAY the case, as written here…
.
Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, it is ordered that the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, case No. 21-5289, is hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Thursday, November 10, 2022, by noon (EST)..
As seen here…
.
.
.
Justice Thomas did NOT require any input or approval to make his ORDER to STAY (pause) the case. Similarly, Raland points out that his understanding is that any of the NINE Justices (though each Justice has a territory to supervise) of the Supreme Court could’ve STAY Raland’s case against them, though it would have been an obvious conflict of interest if Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson had done so. None of the other six exercised that prerogative either.
.
Ultimately, Pres. Trump’s APPLICATION, which successfully resulted in a STAY within one day by Justice Thomas, was later “vacated” on November 22, 2022 by “The Chief Justice [Roberts]” as follows:
“Application (22A362) for stay of the mandate presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is denied. The order heretofore entered by The Chief Justice is vacated”
This opened the door for rationalization for judicial abuse of process at Mar-a-lago raid is stealing TRUMP’s lawfully retained documents. (This is unlike Biden who illegally held documents obtained when a Senator and VP – but for which he did NOT have lawful authority to hold or release with presidential authority as Trump did.)
.
Point #3: Raland believes that due to the sheer quantity of cases dealt with by the Supreme Court’s in house Counsel, that it is very possible that the three Justices Sotomayor, Karen and Jackson very likely HAVE NO IDEA that they’ve been served by Raland Brunson. Instead, it is likely, says Raland, that he attorneys are just following their “normal day to day procedures” — protecting the Justices from any personal liabilities.
.
Point #4: Raland points out that somebody is taking this seriously as Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson have all three have “lawyered-up” and have listed:
.
TRINA A. HIGGINS, United States Attorney (7349)AMANDA A. BERNDT, Assistant United States Attorney (15370).
Point #5: We mused together at the obvious and absurdly false legal doctrine that Judges like to trumpet to justify anything and everything they do — called “absolute judicial immunity” or sometimes calling “sovereign immunity”. Basically the “doctrine” claims that you cannot hold a judge personally accountable or even judicially accountable for any bad actions or Constitutional violations because they are above it all and immune. In other words, they’ve crowned themselves gods, — no infallible gods, incapable of error just because they said so.
.
We, Barbie & Ken vs Goliath lRS and 18 court cases now heading to the Supreme Court following in the foot steps of the Brunson Brothers have often hear this false doctrine trumpeted by the various court we’ve challenged. Basically, our reply has been:
.
And you call yourself a judge? How is it that you don’t understand the most basic of Constitutional principles that ALL are equal under the Law of the Land, yes! even judges AND Supreme Court Justices..And most importantly how can you possible claim to hide behind a made-up “doctrine” of immunity when within your own Oath of Office required to become a judge, you SWORE to protect the Constitution from “enemies foreign and domestic”? The “domestic enemy” part of that Oath presumes that even JUDGES and JUSTICES can be ENEMIES to the Constitution..How dare you think to pretend otherwise?! If you use that term, that alone disqualifies you as Constitutionally incompetent — and unfit for the bench. Please RESIGN now!.
Raland Brunson, along with his three brothers Loy, Darin and Gaynor, have understandably and appropriately been seen as seen as Patriot Heroes fighting for ALL of We the People! And that they are. These men are the kind of men who should be sitting as Senators, Congressmen, etc. Not the Oath-breaking wanna-bees that fill the nation’s Capitol and so many state Capitol buildings in the 50 states.
.
COMING: Additional details on how each and every patriotic, America-loving friend and neighbor can get involved in the fight that is really ALL of We the People against corrupt government anywhere it is found – and yes – even if at the Supreme Court!
.
Thanks Brunson Brothers!
.
see also…
.
.
.
_______________________
SURPRISE! – Raland Brunson has SERVED Three SCOTUS Justices – READ it here!
.