MIRACLE #2 Barbie & Ken invoked the “Savings to Suitors” rule
June 29, 2022
Towards the end of Trail Day #3 – Wednesday – the prosecution had finished its case. “Barbie & Ken” asked Madam Johnson if she had received the 2nd Habeas Corpus – this time from the Utah Court of Appeals (the first having been filed on Friday June 24 in the American Fork District Court – but had been ignored) Again, Madam Johnson showed great displeasure towards the Cromars when they asked about a matter of foundational Constitutional Law (Habeas Corpus) that does not allow the judge any discretion to ignore, but she said that she had been instructed to continue the case anyway, and showed uncharacteristic anger to her apparent embarrassment.
The transcription is not available yet, but the legal explanation was on printed on paper and was read directly into the record exactly as provided below – including punctuation as necessary – as follows:
KEN: Madam Johnson, every time I try to get something into the record, you interrupt me. Do you think you could be quiet and allow me to get something into the record, without being interruption. May I proceed without being interrupted or having my microphone shut off?
MADAM JOHNSON: Go on.
KEN: We, barbara and ken, are INVOKING the “Saving to suitors, in all cases, any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled”
The Constitution is Common Law! There are two sides of every courtroom: the civil law side, and the Common Law side. They run concurrently. But the Common Law is hidden and ignored as if it does not exist. This is long but they will not let you submit it. But you are allowed to say it in your defense. Johnson will seek to shut you up. Maybe the best way to start is to read what is bold.
“…Statutes and the law both state ‘saving to suitors in all cases, all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.’ Now that I have stated this rule from the federal rules of civil procedure this court is bound to let me explain this rule!”
Let the record show that we now in this courtroom invoke the language from the Committees on Rules of PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Announcement of the Chief Justice of the United States SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON, D.C. April 4, 1960.
My wife and I being Suitors in this case, now having secured our Rights, I will Explain this language from that same committee.
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
- Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.
(2) Any prize brought into the United States and all proceedings for the condemnation of property taken as prize.
(As amended May 24, 1949, c. 139, section 79, 63 Statute 101.)
REVISION NOTES for 1948 ACT
Based on title 28, U.S.C. 1940 Edition, sections 41(3) and 371(3), (4) (Mar. 3, 1911, chapter 231, sections 24, par. 3, 256, paragraph 3, 4, 36 Statute 1091, 1160; Oct. 6, 1917, chapter 97, sections 1, 2, 40 Statute 395; June 10, 1922, chapter 216, sections 1, 2, 42 Statute 634).
The “saving to suitors” clause in sections 41(3) and 371(3) of U.S.C. Title 28 1940 edition, was changed by substituting the words, “any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled”, for the words “the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it.”
RULE 2. One Form of Action
There shall be one form of action to be known as “civil action”. NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES 1937 ADOPTION
- Reference to actions at law (meaning common Law) or suits in equity in all statutes should now be treated as referring to the civil action prescribed in these rules.
The saving of a common law remedy by section 9 of the Judiciary act of 1789 (” * * * saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it”)
So Common Law runs Concurrent in this courtroom with this court at this moment. Common Law being the Law of those standing on land. Having invoked this Jurisdiction it being superior to the Jurisdiction of this court: I open our common Law court here and now on the correct side of the court.
(“we judges) have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.” See Cohen v Virginia, (1821), 6 Wheat. 264 and U.S. v will, 499 U.S. 200)
(“”The Constitution is to be interpreted according to Common Law Rules.” — Schick vs. U.S., 195 US 65, 24 Supreme Court 826, 49 L. Edition 99 “)
Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void. Marbury-v-Madison 5 U.S. 137 1 Cranch 137 2 L. Edition 60
__________________
Clerk Johnson, I move the Court that you Order: all fiduciary funds drawn with Bonds upon our trust accounts be immediately returned to us, the Cromars: All Bail Bond Monies, All Bid Bond Monies, all Performance Bond monies, along with any other Bond Monies that have Been set against our trusts. The Court is so ordered to Forbid any agency to declare Bankruptcy to avoid paying the Bonds. All Dun and Bradstreet accounts must forfeit these Monies forth with.
___________________
Clerk Johnson I move this court to order that all Documents to date that have been submitted, then purposely un-received and stricken from the record by this court to be accepted, immediately. Further all Utah corporate imposters impersonating State officers will have their power of Attorney transferred to Ken and Barbra Cromar from Governor Spencer Cox, et. Al.
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal
and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent.
I Move the Court to Order This Action be Dismissed With Prejudice on grounds of lack Jurisdiction on the other side of the court.
___________________
MADAM JOHNSON: I overrule. This trial is closed until tomorrow.
Her over-rule was without authority hence Void — and the record shows that fact, and there are ramifications.
.